the girl on the train review
["388"]Book Review: 'The Girl On The Train,' By Paula Hawkins | : NPR | the girl on the train review
Paula Hawkins‘ The Girl on the Alternation is an abundantly absorbing and austere page-turner. The acutely afflicted characters are what accomplish the atypical exciting. The added pages turned, the added the characters acknowledge themselves, and usually in some appealing troubling, unnerving, or darkly agreeable ways. Hawkins’ atypical is arguably a bigger ball than it is a thriller, and the aforementioned could be said of Tate Taylor‘s adaptation. The Help director’s blur is a sometimes-above-average abstruseness that thrives mostly on its performances.
Below, apprehend our The Girl on the Train spoiler review.
As she says in her narration, Rachel (Emily Blunt), an alcoholic, isn’t the woman she acclimated to be. The woman Rachel acclimated to be was affiliated to Tom (Justin Theroux), and they aggregate a abode calm she now passes every day on the alternation to the city, area she goes to pretend she’s still alive to accumulate her acquaintance (Laura Prepon) somewhat happy. Megan (Haley Bennett) and Scott (Luke Evans) live a few houses bottomward from Rachel’s old home, and Rachel sees them generally from her appearance on the train. In Rachel’s mind, they are the absolute couple. She spends a lot of time apperception their lives, rather than alive on her own.
["1241.6"]The Girl on the Train by Paula Hawkins - book review: Suburban ... | the girl on the train reviewOne day Rachel sees Megan kissing addition man, her therapist Dr. Kamal Abdic (Édgar Ramírez). The angel of Megan with addition man sends Rachel into a bashed rage. She feels betrayed. That night, she drunkenly gets off at the stop by her old adjacency to accost Megan. What absolutely happened afterwards that, though, Rachel doesn’t know. The abutting day she wakes up hungover, aching and covered in blood. She alone remembers flashes of images from the night before, and she’s afraid of what she might’ve done.
Erin Cressida Wilson‘s calligraphy charcoal structurally affectionate to Hawkins’ novel, but some the appearance nuances from the book aren’t in this two-hour movie. There is added to Tom and Rachel’s accord in the atypical that makes their accord added believable, authoritative the abandon and ambidexterity in the adventure added belly and nasty, beneath bogus than it can be here. You could see what Tom already meant to Rachel and the ascendancy Tom could accept over Rachel, but not so abundant here. Of course, not every appearance detail from the book can accomplish it into a blur adaptation, but sometimes characters are corrective too broadly.
Tom’s new wife Anna (Rebecca Ferguson) is a appearance that goes hardly underused in the adaptation. It’s the atomic chichi role, but there’s one arena area she tells Tom she misses the activity of a bedmate that hints there’s added to her than what we’re seeing. It’s a admiration of chastening that goes undiscussed, and it leaves you absent more, because the two added women she’s apprenticed to, Rachel and Megan, are added absolutely accomplished characters. The areas area Anna is defective is no accountability of Ferguson’s, who generally says a lot with a little, like back Rachel tells Tom how accusable he acclimated to accomplish her feel, and Ferguson’s acknowledgment says Anna knows what Rachel means.
["1552"]Liza's Bestselling Book Reviews: Girl on The Train Trailer | The ... | the girl on the train reviewRachel is the brilliant of this ensemble story. That’s a acceptable thing, too, because Emily Blunt is accomplished as the capricious narrator. The extra doesn’t abate any of Rachel’s flaws. Sometimes, like in the added bath sequence, she plays them up, assuming how out of ascendancy the appearance is, how abundant affliction she’s in, and the acrimony she has central her. During this scene, Taylor’s assignment shines best as a director. He doesn’t cut away, absolution the shots run a little continued as the camera closes in Blunt’s face as Rachel lets off some steam. Taylor and his cinematographer Charlotte Bruus Christensen (The Hunt) do a lot of close-ups, maybe too many, but that one puts your face appropriate in Rachel’s affliction and misery, and it’s absurd to attending away.
Weirdly, the abandon isn’t as abashing that sequence. That’s a bit odd, because what occurs in the film, but Taylor exhibits added ascendancy and appearance with the ball than the added accepted abstruseness scenes. Neither the adit arrangement nor Megan’s annihilation accomplish the desired, appalling effect, although Taylor wisely relies on complete back Tom is killing Megan with the rock. These two cardinal sequences action so fast, after a absolute affecting buildup. Sometimes back the administrator should be agee the knife the most, he relents. These scenes are generally attempt too artlessly — which isn’t the case for the affecting scenes, area Taylor uses shadows, the aforementioned compositions, and agnate blocking to tie Megan, Rachel, and Anna together, generally during moments of accuracy or shock.
["388"]The Girl on the Train Movie Review (2010) | Roger Ebert | the girl on the train reviewA little too anon into The Girl on the Train, the big abstruse becomes too visible. Back Scott tells Rachel Megan was pregnant, and the adolescent wasn’t his or her shrink’s, it’s accessible it’s the alone added arresting macho appearance in this adventure dead her. Scott reveals this advice about ten account afore the blur shows Tom is the villain. Too bound you can jump advanced of the cine and ample in the blanks afore aggregate gets revealed, and Tom sits bottomward Anna and Rachel to explain why he did it, which is a allotment of the book that translates decidedly able-bodied to film. Maybe because it’s faster and messier in the movie, the afterpiece actuality has a little added bite to it than it did in the book.
With that third act and the twist, the strings abaft it are visible. The Girl on the Train is a adventure with bright conveniences and some accessible red herrings, but there’s some fun to be had with its predictability. Sometimes the artifice goes through the motions, but actors like Emily Blunt or Allison Janney, arena an invented appearance for the film, advice keep The Girl on the Train from activity like it’s aloof blockage boxes. Blunt area the thriller, while Janney brings much-needed amusement to it.
The blur doesn’t accept the novel’s aphotic faculty of humor, but Janney array some laughs. In added hands, this detective could’ve been a annihilation role, but Janney brings a accurateness and intelligence to the role. Back Anna says Rachel has been blind about at Scott’s house, her acknowledgment — “Yeah, I know” — is said with a subtle, snarky association of, “Yes, I do my job.” Across the board, The Girl on the Train is a well-cast movie, bottomward to the amateur casting as the abstruse red-haired man.
["1358"]REVIEW: The Girl on the Train (film adaptation) | Reading Passport ... | the girl on the train reviewSometimes Taylor and Wilson abduction the spirit of the book, at times they don’t, but back they do it’s back the blur is at its best absorbing and the characters are at their best accessible and atrociously honest. The Girl on the Train is a appropriate adjustment that allowances abundantly from its performances, abnormally Emily Blunt as Rachel. Back Taylor’s blur runs into some trouble, the extra is about there to save it, by carrying one of her best affecting performances to date.
/Film rating: 6.5 out of 10
["800.25"]The Girl On The Train review | Den of Geek | the girl on the train review
["493.73"]The Girl On The Train - Film Review | HuffPost UK | the girl on the train review
["1541.33"]Buy The Girl on the Train: A Novel Book Online at Low Prices in ... | the girl on the train review
["1105.8"]Movie Review: "The Girl on the Train" | Movie Mezzanine | the girl on the train review
["601.4"]The Girl on the Train (Movie Review) - Cryptic Rock | the girl on the train review
["1144.6"]The Girl On The Train Book Review | Take it From Mummy | the girl on the train review
["388"]The Girl on the Train Movie Review (2016) | Roger Ebert | the girl on the train review